Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Surfing Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty☀ 02:03, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] United States Surfing Association

Prodded by User:JuliannaRoseMauriello, deprodded by User:Kappa on grounds that it sounds notable. A quick check, however, determines that it isn't. Under 200 Google hits [[1]], many of which are Wikipedia mirror sites. Eusebeus 09:25, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, non-notable body (replaced shortly after inception by a more notable and permanent one!) inappropriately deprodded by chronic deprodder Kappa. (if it's not already, this might be worth mentioning on the USSF page.)Kuzaar 11:53, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - once someone creates an article for United States Surfing Federation this may be worthy of a mention and a redirect though. -- Hirudo 13:09, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. RGTraynor 16:38, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Agree with Hirudo above, "worthy of a mention". The organization did exist, and may have had historical merit, but without corroborating evidence not worthy of being a mere stub. LittleSurferBoy 19:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. San Saba 04:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep, bad faith nomination. Eusebeus is systematically bringing disputed prods to AfD without regard to merits of dispute. Monicasdude 14:12, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment -- Eusebeus presented reasons for the nom on its own terms. Do you have grounds for your explicitly systematic votes of Speedy Keep other than your dislike of Eusebeus' nominating disputed prods? RGTraynor 14:29, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Eusebus seems to be only nominating Kappa's disputed prods. This is one of the few cases in recent days where he has given a more expansive rationale. Thatcher131 15:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

I just went through the last thirty AfDs Eusebeus has filed, and in each and every case he's given an expansive rationale. RGTraynor 16:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as nonexistant and redundant --Ajdz 18:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep; rename United States Surfing Federation and tag as needing expansion. Peter Grey 18:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Rename to United States Surfing Federation, rewrite to reflect Kuzaar's comment above. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GRBerry (talk • contribs)
• Delete per nom. DarthVader 04:06, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.