Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Planet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:42, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] United Planet
No evidence for encyclopedic notability (see Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)), no independent sources. Article has been tagged for notability since May 2007, for missing sources since August 2006. No hard facts such as the year of foundation, the number of members, funding sources, size of the budget...
I am also nominating the following related pages (now redirects to United Planet) because of the same concerns (no evidence for notability, no sources):
- UP Ambassador Clubs (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (previous versions: announcements of / advertising for projects of the organization)
- UP Special Projects (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (previous versions: announcements of / advertising for projects of the organization)
- VOE (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (previous versions just redirects/link only pages)
- Cultural Awareness Project & UP Storytelling (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (previous versions: announcements of / advertising for projects of the organization)
- Voices of Earth Cultural Exchange (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (previous version: about a web forum run by the organization)
Regards, High on a tree (talk) 23:46, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Promo, fails WP:ORG. KleenupKrew (talk) 01:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- I want a delete. Where's the third party references? Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 02:34, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Organization clearly exists, but seems to be mostly a fee-based clearinghouse for short-term exchanges. Robertissimo (talk) 07:35, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Because the articles do not include citations from reliable sources, they do not appear to be in compliance with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 19:08, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete They may actually be notable, but someone would have to write an article showing that with some outside sources. DGG (talk) 02:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 20:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete all as promos for a nn org. JJL (talk) 02:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
