Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unite*

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 03:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unite*

Unite* (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable organization SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 18:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete No sources to prove notability. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 19:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - reposted content. Tagging. Otto4711 19:20, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This is not a speedy candidate because it never went through AfD (expired proposed deletion tag). Nevertheless, no sign of significant third party-coverage. Pascal.Tesson 19:39, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
• keep seems non-notable claim lacks any backing other than opinion and the first few deletes seem to be calls for improvement, since the article was never marked for improvement before it was sent for deletion, nor does it seem like any editors of the article know about this for whatever reason, perhaps it should just be marked for improve for a few months to see if the sources can be found. --Buridan 04:08, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete no evidence of notability, no sourcing. --RaiderAspect 12:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

• comment isn't that a call for improvement? needs sourcing, improve notability.--Buridan 12:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
• comment Notability cannot be 'improved', it's a characteristic of a topic. If multiple reputatable non-trial third party sources exists, by all means add them and I'll change my vote. --RaiderAspect 14:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
• comment you might want to reconsider that position, notability changes and is improved all the time, most things gain and lose notability, at least that's what jimbo said a while back and i tend to agree. --Buridan 13:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
• comment yes, but if a topic is not notable at this moment, it should be deleted. --RaiderAspect 06:26, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.