Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unification theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, then redirect to Grand unification theory. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-04-08 09:48Z

[edit] Unification theory

Unification theory (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Only mentions one person holding this theory. I'm not convinced that the Notability criterion has been met. In terms of independent coverage of the book/theory, not written by the author - only one very brief "new book notice" or review is cited, and (after having used Google Translate to read it) it's not even clear to me whether it was written by someone other than the book's author. greenrd 23:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as not notable, not NPOV, and too messy to Wikify. Bearian 23:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete what's there, and use as a redirect to Grand unification theory. Grutness...wha? 00:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and make redirect to Grand unification theory per above. Someguy1221 02:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for above. Dthaiger 02:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete: patent nonsense: every unthinkable aspect of the Universe is the sum of one fantastic equation., he equation was so simple it was invisible. Infinity equals Zero. Eventually later a redirect (to Grand unification theory), but only after a clenr page history! Cate | _Talk 13:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete because it is original research.  --Lambiam^Talk 23:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.