Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unheard entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete as non-notable group of people/spam. Stifle (talk) 21:55, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unheard entertainment

Unheard entertainment (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete: Little evidence of notability, unreliable sources given.  – Tivedshambo (talk) 22:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Natalie 22:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
• delete per nom, also see Richard Miner above, speedy vanity. Chris 23:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
• abstain, I realise this is a strange suggestion but I think we should wait and see what happens as a result of TV coverage on Monday. Mallanox 23:27, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. AfDs are supposed to be open for five days, so there will be plenty of time to reevaluate if anything changes as a result of the TV coverage. Natalie 00:30, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.