Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underwear Wearer

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (with a recommendation that it be included in BJAODN). Rossami (talk) 01:20, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Underwear Wearer

Non-encyclopedic. Delete. utcursch | talk 09:47, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)

• BJAODN --Plaque Saalt 09:55, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- Karada 09:59, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN and ripe for it! --Reiners 10:13, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN Damn! You beat me there! --North Lights 10:18, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete ASAP - why are we wasting time discussing it? Deb 12:36, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN =D - Mailer Diablo 13:35, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and "where" isn't the same as "wear"! --Christofurio 13:52, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN - --Sufferage Tennero 09:38, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN - Funny Article! --Liquor of Northren Ireland 09:43, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Save it into BJAODN. Zzyzx11 01:13, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Thanks for putting a smile on my face. Zzyzx11 06:36, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Ahahahaha... BJAODN. Tygar 05:42, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- Chrysalis 05:50, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN - This kind of thing just isn't "nessescary" --Teknic 06:57, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN --Phil | Talk 13:20, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.