Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underpodcast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Kirill Lokshin 03:27, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Underpodcast

Non-notable neologism. -- Captain Disdain 02:47, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. (I suppose it could also be merged, but I really don't think it's a notable term.) -- Captain Disdain 02:47, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Not notable today, but perhaps it may be in the near future. (unsigned by 64.247.254.154)
• Then it can definitely be added in the near future. Until then, it shouldn't have an article. (Last comment by was by author of the article.) Devotchka 03:16, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable-Dakota 03:49, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. Gazpacho 04:24, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

OK fair enough, we'll have to wait and see if it becomes notable. Underpod 06:24, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. --Peruvianllama 07:29, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. It might belong in Wiktionary some day, though. TECannon 12:13, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable now. We don't know if it will be notable later. --Optichan 16:02, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above reasons. nn --->Newyorktimescrossword 19:27, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.