Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Under the Umbrella Tree (1986)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep. Sorry for rolling this one forward; I was a bit distracted. —Cryptic (talk) 17:06, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Under the Umbrella Tree (1986)

Article is of an unsourceable television show in Canada, where there are obviously not much televisions nor television stations able to air any programs. Obviously this show is either nonexistant or American. Vote to remove. Darwiner111 10:56, 31 December 2005 (UTC).

Keep. While it's not the thing I wish Wikipedians would spend their time on, I think it is a legitimate article and show. -- Mikeblas 10:58, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Keep (strong). As the individual that has recently edited the UtUT article from its poor state to the updated, information and picture-packed state it is now in, I vote for a keep. Also, how is this "unsourceable"? Search anywhere on the internet and you'll see it did exist. There are televisions in Canada by the way, considering there are 33,000,000 Canadians, that would come to about 132,000,000 televisions in the country. (We don't all live in igloos) PatrickA 11:11, 31 December 2005 (UTC).

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:18, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. Seems to be a bad faith nomination or maybe it's making a WP:POINT which I don't quite understand. Pburka 15:59, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, a well known Canadian children's programme. - SimonP 16:14, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep This appears to be a legitimate television programme. -- (aeropagitica)  16:17, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep as has been done with other national TV shows nominated without any reason. Note, since nominator has so few edits and vote doesn't count, there's not a single valid delete vote. So we might as well close this early. Comments about Canada indicate this is a bad faith nomination (aka a prank). --Rob 16:58, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.