Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncyclopedia (eighth nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep, obvious bad faith nom as user has history of vandalism and other disruptive edits. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 23:48, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Uncyclopedia
AfDs for this article:
Seems to be advertising the site, with nothing to prove it is notable. Please do not speedy close this nomination. USApr0n 15:55, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, I see articles from New York Times Select, Guardian Unlimited, Hindustan Times, the New Zealand Herald, and Arizona Daily Star. I'd say that's notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Diletante (talk • contribs) 17:03, August 28, 2007 (UTC)
- Keep its a notable subject, has enough sources to back up notability. Sherzo 20:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, Very popular website, a large amounts of hits, has enough sources, as per above, (http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=uncyclopedia.org&url=uncyclopedia.org/) and there is absolutely no reason to delete --KaufmanIsAwesome 20:35, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's worth keeping. Uberpickle 18:08, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep please check the references section and the other deletion nominations before nominating an article for deletion. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 21:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, the notability is well-illustrated by the references and the site has been mentioned in the mass media. Also, I personally don't see any "advertising" of the site, so I assume a bad faith nom. I'd also like to point out that this is USApr0n's 3rd edit on Wikipedia. And, there's also vandalism among his few contributions, so the nom itself may be a prank.Erratic Communist 22:19, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
