Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncle Chom
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete--JForget 00:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Uncle Chom
Non-notable neologism, contested prod. A meager number of Google hits indicates that the term is not in wide use. Article on the journalist who allegedly coined the term is also up for deletion for non-notability as of this moment. --Finngall talk 17:13, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This article is a non-notable neologism, as the nom suggested. Icestorm815 19:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, promoting it on Wikipedia is not the way to get your protologism into the dictionary. --Dhartung | Talk 20:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, urban dictionary dot com is a better place for fake new words, not wikipedia. Mindraker 00:05, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Possibly libelous. i kan reed 02:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete that's even less clever than "General Betrayus" Ewlyahoocom 19:07, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
