Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unalienable

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect to Unalienable rights. Sjakkalle 11:48, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Unalienable

Article is about unalienable rights or inalienable rights about which there are two seperate articles. --TimPope 09:09, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect to Unalienable rights. Darksun 10:03, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Delete the title is a lone adjective? This is like creating an article called Civil about Civil Rights... Is there such a thing as an ambiguation page? 66.94.94.154 13:12, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect per Darksun. It's the sort of thing one might try to wikilink in an article (and alone, especially if you were also trying to link rights; unalienable rights...) Samaritan 14:32, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect sounds fair. That's the common usage of said word. 'Civil' has a bunch of other ones. Radiant_* 15:39, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Unalienable rights. El_C 23:08, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.