Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umar ibn Walid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete, the article is a substub and has no sources cited. Verifiablility issues have not been adequately addressed. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Umar ibn Walid

Although I'm much against systemic bias this has no claim of notability and possibly son of and candidate for being father of are just too tenuous.

• Delete as per my nom. Dlyons493 Talk 21:38, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:V. Stifle 00:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Deleteas above.Blnguyen 03:09, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, important part of Islamic geneaology. Next time someone types this in, they should not have to create a new article to fill in our wilful ignorance of the topic - and then see it deleted again. Kappa 18:52, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I'd be happy to be proved wrong on this. If you add the references showing where this fits into Islamic geneaology I'll withdraw the nomination. Dlyons493 Talk 19:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.