Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UltraExplorer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] UltraExplorer
non-notable software, see WP:SOFTWARE -- Y not? 09:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Why is it non-notable? This software has several notable features for file managers. Such as Plugins support and others. I added the parts about features and about lacks to the article recently. What else can I change?
--AlexT12 09:24, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment you can't change notability by changing the article (though if the subject is notable the article should say so, and say why, and source it). Some subjects (like, say, my cat Mittens) just aren't notable. Please refer to Wikipedia:Notability for guidelines on whether a subject is considered "notable" by Wikipedia standards. For example: has anyone independent written a book about this software ("UltraExplorer For Dummies" would go a long way)? Has there been a TV show about it? An article in the New York Times? I don't know the software, I have no view on whether it should pass or fail these tests. Notinasnaid 09:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- Thanks Notinasnaid, I understand your comment. I may agree that UltraExplorer is not notable currently. OK. Let's wait some time, a year maybe. --AlexT12 09:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
- I think your template {{afdm}} is enough, you can do your deletion if you sure it's non-notable. --AlexT12 01:37, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Delete, this product lacks significant coverage and notability. -- lucasbfr talk 10:32, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable Think outside the box 12:06, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. andy 21:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
