Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultra-humane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:47, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ultra-humane

A hoax involving the humane keeping of livestock. The suggestion to keep "gentle roosters" with the chickens gives it away.

Was tagged {{prod}} until an anon removed the tag. Pilatus 21:10, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. I was the one who originally {{prod}}ed this. Article has slightly changed in tone and context since then, but basic rationale still holds, which was: "Ultra-humane in this context may be a neologism for this concept. Google cannot verify this usage. Article may also be based on original research and have an anti-meat industry bias. (NOTE: Same user crosslinked article from Chicken.)" Have to agree with sentiment that this is a hoax as well. --Kinu 21:18, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not necessarily a hoax, but certainly a neologism that is not WP:V. All this talk about chicken makes me want some KFC.--Isotope23 21:20, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Mechanically recovered meat? That's the exact opposite of "ultra-humane". Spot on, mate! Pilatus 21:37, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Wikipedia is not a soapbox, etc. etc. etc. Delete.--み使い Mitsukai 21:37, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Avi 21:57, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 08:14, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.