Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimate theory of reality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 08:21, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ultimate theory of reality

Very clearly original research, personal essay &c. No more needs to be said. [[Sam Korn]] 14:30, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. If external reality doen't need to exist, then neither does this article. Dlyons493 16:01, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

I'm the auther, and new to wikipedia; it would be helpful if someone could expain to me why the entry is up for deletion- as a newbie I don't understand what the problem is?

OK, I've done some looking in the FAQs and now understand that Wiki doesn't host original stuff- UToR is original so I guess you should delete it. Anyone know of a similar kind of thing to wikipedia that does host such stuff? Apologies for posting something innapropriate. As a bit of constructive feedback, it may be worth your while making it clearer that you don't want original work; I did check several of the intro FAQs prior to posting, and didn't pick up on that.

• To the author:
  • First of all, you should always sign your entries by putting four tildes (~~~~) after your entries. If you don't have a user name, create one and sign in.
  • Regarding original research, see Wikipedia:No original research.
  • Valid contributions to the Wikipedia are always welcome.
    DanMS 18:19, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

• To the author: Apologies for the somewhat sarcastic vote for deletion above - I was assuming awareness of the guidelines. Why not create an account (it's free and very quick) and that will give you a user page onto which you can put your article with no fear of it being deleted. You can then work on it, as and when you wish, to make more like what wiki expects an article to be. Good luck. Dlyons493 19:02, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NOR, obviously a misunderstanding of what Wikipedia is. --Pjacobi 20:50, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• delete Original research. Creator/new editor seems to understand. <joke> And just as I was about to redirect it to 42</joke> WCFrancis 02:54, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Obvious nonsense. / Peter ^Isotalo 05:22, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.