Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultima Morgan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--JForget 23:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ultima Morgan

Ultima Morgan (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable biography with no assertion of notability —Preceding unsigned comment added by Accounting4Taste (talk • contribs)

I am also nominating the following related page because its subject is also WP:NN:
John B. Morgan (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) --Evb-wiki 04:23, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I tagged this with a speedy tag, which another editor removed (no problem there) but I don't think this article either asserts notability or has it. She's a lawyer, she's a partner in her spouse's company. The one reference outside their own website is a news article that doesn't mention her name, only his. Accounting4Taste 00:48, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Should be a speedy delete as no notability is asserted, per WP:CSD#A7. Interesting name, though. faithless (speak) 01:14, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
    • Ditto for Mr.Morgan (though his name is much less interesting). faithless (speak) 06:53, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I don't see anything remarkable or notable about her bio. I would have put a speedy delete on it myself as well. But that's me. Pigman 02:09, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity non-notable bio. Keb25 02:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per anony-nom, nothing remarkable to see here. RFerreira 04:02, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. I'm adding her husband's/law partner's bio to this discussion. Neither he nor she, nor the law firm of Morgan & Morgan, is notable. This is a subtle advert. --Evb-wiki 04:23, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I'm the one who de-speedied it, as IMO "one of the primary partners" is a sufficient assertion to make it past A7. Nothing to pass WP:BIO, though, and I don't see how it could be expanded. — iridescent (talk to me!) 19:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.