Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uli Herzner

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 15:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Uli Herzner

Uli Herzner (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable losing contestant on a reality television show. No claim to notability established in article, very few references that are not PR from the program. Mikeblas 20:06, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep. Again it has been established that finalists on popular reality televison shows are notable. You may not like the show, but that is not reason to delete the article. Crunch 04:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Again? Where? Punkmorten 13:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
    • On the contrary, I think that we've established that reality show contestants aren't notable. I don't see any mention of them in WP:BIO; the "television personalities" section doesn't apply, and there have been plenty of deletions that exercise this precedent—including America's Next Top Model contestants, non-notable Survivor contestants (you know: the ones who didn't get arrested), and so on. -- Mikeblas 14:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless someone answers Punkmorten's question above. I'll watchlist this and will change my vote if I see a reasonable answer. Kla'quot 05:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. I take no position on reality TV stars in general, but I think there's an argument to be made for Ms. Herzner meeting the notablity guidelines. She's got the bio on Bravo, an interview with Entertainment Weekly online[1], and her Project Runway collection is displayed on Nymag.com [2]. It's not an overwhelming case, but this isn't paper.--Kubigula (talk) 23:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.