Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubiquiti Networks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:42, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ubiquiti Networks

Article was vandalised, and the vandalised version was nominated for deletion. The nomination was malformed and nothing happened. I have unvandalised the article, but am not sure whether the result meets with WP:CORP. Therefore I'm now sending it here for discussion.➨ ЯЄDVERS 14:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Article is inaccurate -- Joe Benvenuti is not an owner nor affiliated with Ubiquiti Networks (www.ubnt.com).

Please remove this fact or delete the article in its entirety.

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Petros471 16:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete difficult to decide, it appears to be a succesful company, couldn't find any news related articles on them. Article may be for advertising, can't really tell. I don't believe the article is going to get anywhere anyway.--Andeh 17:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

  Changed to Delete, 0 news hits.--Andeh 20:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Keep they seem slightly notable. They also have 17,400 google hits. —Mets501 (talk) 17:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. No articles link to this one, its creator created the article and hasn't edited since (implying self-promotion). Company shows no signs of notability. It's just a free high-Google-rank advert, and that's not what we're here for. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 12:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 14:05, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: Relisting one more time because the votes aren't really that strong either way. --Deathphoenix ʕ 14:05, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - No sources, specific claims of notability. No opposition to keeping if new (cited) information is added to the article. Wickethewok 14:45, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Wickethewok. Ifnord 14:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Opened last year and has 2 WP:NN patents, so where's thenotability ??? DavidHumphreys ^{SPEAK TO ME}ABOUT _{THE THINGS I MESSED UP} 15:40, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: No mentions either on C|Net, Forbes or Fortune. No press mentions in the first five pages of Google for "Ubiquiti", only results are sales pitches or product listings. Initial contributor has disappeared so self-promotion is highly-likely. Fails WP:CORP anyway. --  Netsnipe  ^(Talk)  17:26, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.