Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubies

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Abrogo (delete) (the Latin citations were a traditional "dummy" typesetting text & comedy/tragedy play by Rev. Jacob Masen, SJ) SkierRMH (talk) 08:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ubies

Ubies (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete as hoax article. No real sources can be found for this "disease". None of the references given have any relevance to the subject. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 01:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Strong Delete as original PROD nominator. Obvious hoax. —Travistalk 01:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Commment Someone needs to verify the source. It isnt a hoax as it claims to be sourced however badly it is written. --Neon white (talk) 01:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: Non notable, and lack of sourcing to include in the article. - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Further researches suggests to me that it is, in fact, uttter rubbish.--Neon white (talk) 01:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete. Looks like a hoax. Malinaccier (talk • contribs) 01:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete as hoax, no sources can be found on "Ubies" in this form. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:58, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 02:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Uber Delete! - A smartly written HOAX. Spawn Man (talk) 03:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Utter nonsense. The sources used in the article have nothing to do with "ubies" as a disease, or anything else. Hal peridol (talk) 03:42, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Open your eyes... you are all blind! I have edited the article to add more evidence. Read and learn. --David Broadfoot (talk) 06:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete hoaxalicious. Above editor is now suspect (look at the changes he made). JuJube (talk) 07:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.