Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uberfic

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep Jtkiefer ^{T | @ | C} ----- 01:16, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Uberfic

A genre of fanfiction. As such, non-encyclopedic. Has no apparent notability outside Xena fandom (if that). First page of google hits are from Wikipedia or Wikipedia clones. Sandstein 15:03, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

• delete I tried, but couldn't find any evidence that this is notable or that this meaning is authoritative. — brighterorange (talk) 15:55, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Refs:[1], [2], [3]. This is very common term in XWP fandom and from my experance it seems to be spreading in use. -james_anatidae 04:59, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Add reference to the aricle on fan fiction if you like, but this doesn't merit its own article. -Sean Curtin 19:33, September 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to Xena and/or to fan fiction. Per WP:FICT, something has to be more than Xenacruft to merit its own article. I'm not persuaded that this term has any widespread or substantial currency outside this one hobby that has no relevance to reality. Barno 19:31, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, notable genre of fanfic. Kappa 17:25, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.