Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubercaster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  18:54, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ubercaster

Placed on prod as an advertisement, then the creator, Featheredtar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log), removed it. Next, I placed it back on prod without checking history to see it had been pulled. But now I have, so here we are. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:04, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:04, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wait until it's released to see if someone else thinks it's revolutionary. (I.e. notable.) Grandmasterka 17:07, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete One sentence and a link about something that is 'revolutionary'. I'm sure we can do without this. Not many googles either. —kotepho 2006-03-19 16:54Z
• Delete. Not-a-crystal-ball, etc. Bucketsofg 19:28, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as all the above. Gwernol 20:22, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete spam caster. -- Arnzy (Talk) 22:56, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, WP:NOT. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 05:11, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.