Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ub3Rm3Ist3r

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 10:36, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ub3Rm3Ist3r

Delete WP:WINAD WP:VANITY WP:V Schizombie 08:51, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete incredibly local non-notable unverifiable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. — Adrian Lamo ·· 08:54, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: I was gonna add "or userfy", but the author already mirrored it on his userpage, so no issues with deletion. — Adrian Lamo ·· 08:55, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • übermeister ist not a word in German as the article suggests. Delete as the whole article is complete fallacy. Bobby1011 09:03, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Returns only six results on Google. Obviously just a username and not an established word.--Tokek 10:02, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete nonsense. --Terence Ong 10:22, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Given the above comments, I think this qualifies as a vanity page as well. Perhaps this kid was trying to prove to a friend that ubermeister was a real word? Shaggorama 10:45, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete complete twaddle. I'd vote the same if he'd said "Ob3rh3rr" instead (Oberherr being German for overlord). Tonywalton  | Talk 13:57, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete something made up in school -WP:NOT. Camillus (talk) 14:31, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete One schoolboy's non-notable l337-speak handle, based on a misunderstanding of German in an article replete with spelling mistakes. WP:VANITY refers, as per nom.  (aeropagitica)  21:03, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- ~~~~
    Deco 23:33, 26 February 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.