Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UXO! AN UNPERCEIVED THREAT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] UXO! AN UNPERCEIVED THREAT

UXO! AN UNPERCEIVED THREAT (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This article subject might be notable, but the article is so poorly-written that it'd be better to delete and start it again. That is, if it's even notable, and not a soapbox/hoax article. Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 07:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Essay and fork of Unexploded ordnance. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 08:00, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per above and Bomb disposal. phøenixMøurning ( ^talk/_contribs ) 08:11, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete essay. WillOakland (talk) 08:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Essay on a topic which we already have an article on. Nick Dowling (talk) 11:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —Nick Dowling (talk) 11:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Unsourced, poorly formatted essay on unexploded ordnance. We already have many articles covering this subject, we certainly do not need another one consisting entirely of synthesis. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 15:06, May 17, 2008 (UTC)
• Delete an OR personal essay, poorly formatted with signs of page ownership. Wikipedia is not LiveJournal. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 17:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as per above (others have already raised good points). TomStar81 (Talk) 04:37, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as patent nonsense. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 06:17, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete it's not quite patent nonsense, but its a soapbox essay not appropriate to Wikipedia.-- danntm ^T _C 20:10, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: part of it incorporates some material from http://www.uxocanada.forces.gc.ca/Info/UXOTypes_e.asp without citing the source. http://www.uxocanada.forces.gc.ca is a Canadian government site, but its content is licensed freely for non-commercial use only, and proper attribution is required. Not sure if this is compatible with GFDL or not. The rest of it can be deleted for the reasons mentioned by RHaworth. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 10:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: Poorly written, unsourced, the whole nine-yards. Cheers! Cam (Chat) 05:23, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.