Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-H)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:59, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-H)

USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-H) and USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-I). Not only are they fictional, they don't even exist in fiction. Delete. Gamaliel 19:40, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete - Wikipedia is not a crystal fancruft ball. -Satori 20:22, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, for the same reason Enterprise-B was kept for years before we saw it on screen.Gateman1997 20:38, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete; oh dear. Erwin Walsh
  • Gateman, that was in the days when there was a running Star Trek series. Delete. The only possible content is "They may exist but we know nothing about them" DJ Clayworth 20:54, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
    • Delete. No, they can not exist. Even if they were talked about they are still fictional craft, remember? Dystopos 06:19, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
  • The final sentence of both articles ("In official canon nothing is, as yet, known about her or her crew.") tells us outright that the subject is unverifiable. If there's no knowledge, there can be no encyclopaedia article. Delete. Uncle G 20:57:36, 2005-08-19 (UTC)
  • delete non existant non existant starships. Sabine's Sunbird 21:18, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Recreate it if and when there is at least a little bit to say about it, other than that nothing is known about it. ManoaChild 22:54, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete both articles per above. Fernando Rizo T/C 23:05, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
  • This article made me laugh out loud. I love it. Delete. —Charles O'Rourke 23:19, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete the worst kind of cruft. And wiki didn't even exist when Generations came out, right? ;) --Etacar11 03:56, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete both as fanon, crystal ball, take your pick. When a movie or TV series establishes these vessels, let's have articles about them. 23skidoo 05:20, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete This Trekker knows these are ridiculously unverifiable. Xoloz 20:10, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete for H and Strong Delete for I - Given that some existing suffix systems avoid the use of the letters I and O to avoid confusion with 1 and 0, one can't even make the assumption that because there was a fictional Enterprise-J that there will have been a fictional Enterprise-I. Caerwine 23:56, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete, pure Trekkie screedspam. --Agamemnon2 14:31, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.