Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USAF Shihan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coredesat 05:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] USAF Shihan

USAF Shihan (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable subject - please see the article's talk page. Peter Rehse 12:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletions. —Peter Rehse 12:24, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete or heavily crop and merge to Shihan not distinctive enough within the organisation to out of the organisation to deserve a separate article --Nate1481( ^t/_c) 12:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

A very minor relevance to the Shihan article - not sure how you could merge that.Peter Rehse 12:52, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - most of the article isn't even about him, and what there is of him, isn't worth keeping. There isn't a single source to say he's notable. Jauerback 14:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Its not about an individual - but a group of individuals.Peter Rehse 14:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Wow, did I misread that. I read the first line and thought it said something along the lines of "he is the highest ranking" individual in that group. It's still a delete, though. Jauerback 14:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. See WP:N. Subdolous 14:48, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and my comments at talk. Bradford44 17:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.