Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UNSW Medshow
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:33, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] UNSW Medshow
Deletion nomination Small non-notable student society event that has only been around since 2000. Does not assert encyclopedic notability. Wikipedia is not a free webhosting service for university societies. ~15 to ~30 unique ghits on google[1][2].Terrible puns. Bwithh 05:10, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete if Medsoc is non-notable, then their event is non-notable. Also, the puns seem to be worsening with time. Opabinia regalis 06:03, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete article as nn, although those puns are awesomely terrible. -- Synapse 12:07, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable. --zero faults |sockpuppets| 14:15, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I'm sorry I missed the "Karma Suture" show though. Dlyons493 Talk 16:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. I can find no verifiable references to any of these shows in the Australian media or elsewhere. Bwithh has already outlined the problems with finding sources on Google. While it may have been fun for the participants, this doesn't make the grade at this stage. Capitalistroadster 05:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 05:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Is this not related t the UNSW Revues nomination, and if so, why is it on its own? Ansell 03:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Article says that the show is a rival to the official med revue, not a part of them, and its a separate article Bwithh 03:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete completely unencyclopedic.Blnguyen | rant-line 06:46, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete It's not notable, and right sourced. *~Daniel~* ☎ 02:52, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.