Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UKweatherworld

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] UKweatherworld

Contested prod, does not follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Notability (web). Tim! 16:47, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

The page has been edited as per the Notability (web) guidelines, and is not on Wikipedia for the purpose of anything apart from telling people what we do as an organisation. User:Dave Clarke 18:20, 18 October 2006 (BST)

It's not really close to the guidelines at :WEB, for that you need at least one of;

• Major media coverage (with links)
• A recognized, independent award (with verification)
• The site to be hosted and distributed by a major site / provider

Nobody is judging its value to its members, it doesn't hit encyclopedic as defined on WP. Deizio talk 20:59, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete fails WP:WEB — I'm sure it's a great forum, but it is not notable. —ptk✰fgs 18:00, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn forum. Deizio talk 20:59, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• keep - will point people to a place where they can discuss weather Pflatau 18:27, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• weak delete - not notable, but an be added as an external link if people wish to discuss weather, as can "netweather.tv" if so required/desired. Alternatively, could feature in a section of an article on weather disscussion forums or similar. Crimsone 17:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.