Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UH-6F

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete, A7. —Cuiviénen 18:07, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] UH-6F

Advertisement Nv8200p talk 00:52, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

433 g-hits, which by my standards, means delete. Morgan Wick 00:54, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Clear ad of non notable product Rockpocket 03:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, clearly an Ad. --WinHunter ^(talk) 05:26, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Looks like an ad, walks like an ad, quacks like an ad. Beaner1 05:51, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, ad. --Coredesat 06:11, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as advertisment. No notability established. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 06:15, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Robertsteadman 09:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. —Mets501 (talk) 13:09, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Wisden17 13:23, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I cannot overemphasise how important it is to delete this article. Well, I could say This article is the leading cause of tooth decay in Europe, and that can only be stopped by deletion or If this article isn't deleted, the Allies will retroactivily lose World War II. Nonetheless, the advertisement should be deleted. WilyD 13:48, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Let's get this over with. Hshhh, I´m not really here 17:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.