Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UEK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. Fails notability criteria. --Madchester 21:42, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] UEK

Delete. Non-notable artist. Nothing relevant can be found from Google that isn't a mirror site of Wikipedia. ... discospinster _talk 00:24, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Nonnotable artist, no claim of any works in museums, major showings, etc. NawlinWiki 01:06, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete hyperbolic exaggeration about nothing. Non-notable and probable vanity. Opabinia regalis 01:45, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Vanispamicruftisement. JChap (Talk) 01:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia 02:06, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Alias Flood 02:28, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. If the article can't even say the name of its subject...well...that's a new low. Alphachimp ^talk 05:26, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Michael 06:08, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn corp, spam.--Andeh 06:33, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom..this is an advertisement. Davidpdx 19:03, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Zos 19:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator. Regards, E Asterion ^{u talking to me?} 23:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.