Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U2's Dublin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] U2's Dublin

U2's Dublin (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Rather a wiki theme guide than an article itself, but it may fit somewhere else Tikiwont 10:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - redundant to Dublin, unnecessary redirect. MER-C 13:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete some sort of unidentified -cruft. the article is almost all external links. no wikilinks. OR for sure. doesn't have any redeeming value. most infor can most likely be found in the U2 or Dublin articles. --Tainter 14:34, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment - well the links are weblinks back to wikipedia, which is why I called it kind of theme guide. Tikiwont 14:42, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment - I disagree on it redundancy to Dublin and is highly relevant. I might suggets you come to Dublin and slot the U2 article into the U2's Dublin article. Those two articles - U2 or Dublin - do not connect into a coherent U2's Dublin - both geographical (Dublin) and historic (U2) information not giving much appreciationas to where U2 came from

Dave 16:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete unnecessary. Eusebeus 17:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above _SUBWAYguy 06:36, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Suggestion to author: This would make fine content for h2g2, which doesn't want entries that duplicate Wikipedia articles, but if this is deleted here it will be eligible over there. JamesMLane t c 11:20, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete great idea for a magazine article. Bad idea for a encyclopedia article. Shaundakulbara 01:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.