Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TzHaar Fight Cave

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 14:36, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] TzHaar Fight Cave

ATTENTION! If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}

Keep it i need this page

delete RuneScape location , unencyclopedic. Melaen 20:34, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Keep Tarikochi 05:58, 2 February 2006 (UTC) - I do not think it should be deleted or even be considered for deletion at all. This is a major part of RuneScape, and considered one of the highest honours to complete, giving a necessary reason to keep the article.

Keep The only other thing you can do with this article is to merge it with RuneScape Locations and that would be very very very messy. J.J.Sagnella 07:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

It should not be deleted because there is no reason for it to be.You may think that it is unencyclopedic, but the people who actually like to play RuneScape and go and fight these things may need advice or tips on how to beat them,etc.

Tarikochi 01:39, 3 February 2006 (UTC) - I would also like to add that the "TzHaar Fight Cave" is not a location, despite its name. The "Fight Cave" is actually a RuneScape mini-game, furthering the reason why this article should not be deleted.

• Delete I admit I have an addiction towards this RuneScape game, however I really don't think RuneScape warrants 16 articles. This is one of the articles that doesn't warrant to be an article. —MESSEDROCKER (talk) 02:18, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep This is a lot of time and effort wasted if this was to be deleted. Some information on a small subject is better than no information on a small subject. If needed, merger with TzTok-Jad. SSR600 07:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • TzTok-Jad recently got merged with this. As did Fire cape.J.J.Sagnella 07:47, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to some part of RuneScape. This is not a keep vote. Stifle 15:38, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep There is a lot of useful information in the article, and it is an integral part of the RS series (into which it should be reinstated). Merging with the RuneScape locations section would not work, as this article has much more information than the other locations - • | Đܧ§§Ť | • ^{T | C} 17:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or merge into RuneScape locations, gamecruft. This is not a keep vote. -- nae'blis _(talk) 21:12, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. TzTok-Jad was an article about an important monster in RuneScape (the most powerful). There was also an article about the TzHaar Fight Caves and the fire cape. Recently, it was all merged together. The TzHaar Fight Cave is not a regular location, it's an important mini-game like Castle Wars. If you don't believe me, go here. Dtm142 18:04, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. TzHaar Fight cave is a mini-game and not part of the whole RS map, therefore, not technically a location.--Driken 23:45, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. RuneScape location, we have locations/characters/items from a number of other games as well. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:06, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

May be better to seek consensus on A larger list of AFD instead of just this one.

• Keep or merge - RuneScape is big enough to warrant more than one article, though maybe not as many as it has Ace of Risk 17:16, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.