Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyson Mao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Mike's reasoning at the end is hardly valid, but Fagstein and MrFizyx have provided reasonable arguments. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tyson Mao

This is a Vanity Page. The only source cited is the subject's blog. Geekera 17:22, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as Vanity. Grafikm_fr 17:40, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep He appears to have gotten some media coverage. Fagstein 06:58, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep. Counting google hits doesn't seem to make a strong case for or against notability. If he really has set new records with the Rubik's cube, I suppose he is notable enough. -MrFizyx 15:47, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I've just read WP:BIO again and I say, not yet. Let's not grant the laurels of encyclopedicness too soon, or we might discourage Tyson from accomplishing something that will really be worth remembering in 100 years ;-) — Hillel 16:07, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Tyson is cool Mike 00:07, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.