Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyrone Luther Hadnott

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per WP:BLP1E. Davewild (talk) 08:24, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tyrone Luther Hadnott

Tyrone Luther Hadnott (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I helped created this article, but now I wonder if it is just news, or if it is still notable after it has left the news. What does the community think? Keep or Delete? ChetblongT C 02:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete Seems to be in violation of WP:BLP1E -- no news coverage outside this event that I can find. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Definite delete. Potentially libelous biography of a living person. No sources verify claims of article. This should be speedily deleted. Dgf32 (talk) 04:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Although I brought this article to AFD, it was not because it is/was a libelous BLP. It is in fact sourced to verify these claims and there are many more sources that could be found to verify the statements made in the article. Therefore it does not qualify for speedy deletion as you have stated. A quick Google News search shows that the article is verified. --ChetblongT C 05:14, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Only briefly notable. Snowfire51 (talk) 04:46, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Reuters has a piece on it [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.115.6.240 (talk) 17:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Just because it's not so big in the US doesn't mean it's not HUGE in Japan. It's a big deal there. English language Wikipedia caters more than just to Americans last time I checked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.54.213.108 (talk) 00:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.