Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyrannosaurus Rex (2009 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 20:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tyrannosaurus Rex (2009 film)

Tyrannosaurus Rex (2009 film) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Planned film to be released more than a year from now, nothing really known about it. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Dougie WII (talk) 18:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep There's no real reason to delete. Nothing it violates the guidelines on CRYSTAL, aside from the fact that its an upcoming film. Its certainly not the first time an article has been made about a film coming out later. The information is verifiable, there's no speculation or "crystal balling". If it was vague speculation like "Rob Zombie said he might be doing another film in the next year or so" that would be one thing but we already have the title, director, release date and the beginning of the cast.--CyberGhostface (talk) 18:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF. Has not been completed and nothing about the production of this film is notable. Collectonian (talk) 18:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per the notability guidelines for future films; there is no verifiable information that production is underway. IMDb shows that it is only in development. Many projects have had various elements "ready" for production but are never guaranteed to actually go through. WP:CRYSTAL shouldn't really apply here -- talk about the project is verifiable, but per WP:NFF, it's not appropriate for a stand-alone article to exist unless filming is verified to have begun. There is minimal information here, anyway -- I would recommend putting a brief mention of it at the bottom of Rob Zombie#Filmography and recreate the article if production begins. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete Since I'm in the minority, just delete it then.--CyberGhostface (talk) 20:49, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
First of all you have two votes now, please cross one out, second of all, if you're going to say speedy delete, can you please underline which CSD it meets? The Dominator (talk) 03:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak keep pending sourcing. The director and studio are notable. The only issue is only one source. I say keep the article for a few months to either allow better sourcing or for confirmation that this is a hoax, at which point it can be speedied if necessary. 23skidoo (talk) 22:37, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
    • If its a hoax, its one that Rob Zombie himself is participating in. He's discussed the film on his MySpace.--CyberGhostface (talk) 23:49, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete there's not that much info and per WP:Crystal. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep — Article is sourced. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 03:49, 13 April 2008 (UTC))
No, it's not, it cites one unreliable website that talks about a possible rumor that the movie might eventually be made. The DominatorTalkEdits 13:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.