Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twilight (Warriors)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 18:29, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Twilight (Warriors)

Twilight (Warriors) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

WP:NOT Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, section 7. Plot summaries. Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance, not solely a summary of that work's plot. A plot summary may be appropriate as an aspect of a larger topic. Nominating 14 articles total that are nothing but plot summeries.

Firestar's Quest (Warriors) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

The Sight (Warriors) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Sunset (Warriors) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Starlight (Warriors) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Dawn (Warriors) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Midnight (Warriors) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Moonrise (Warriors) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

The Darkest Hour (Warriors) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

A Dangerous Path (Warriors) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Rising Storm (Warriors) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Forest of Secrets (Warriors) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Fire and Ice (Warriors) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Into the Wild (Warriors) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) Purgatory Fubar ^Converse or Snafu 22:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

• Keep all These are notable books from a notable series. If they're nothing but plot summaries now, that's cause for expansion, not deletion. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:17, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. This has nothing to do with notablity but policy it self. These articles fail to meet Wikipedia policy as outlined in Plot summaries Purgatory Fubar ^Converse or Snafu 23:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Then it requires cleanup, not deletion. --Wafulz 01:09, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep The solution, like that for the Sword of Truth series is cleanup, not deletion. FrozenPurpleCube 02:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep all Cleanup is the best option. ^DAVID _CAT 16:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep All We have a discussion going on the talk page about merging these articles. -Razorclaw 22:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC) ~not logged in
• Keep All I agree with Davidcat, a little cleanup here and there, and deletion won't make sense. Crowstar 10:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep All They need fixup, yes, but they are very notable and we already have a disgussion going on about merging them. Elfin341 19:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep it! These are great pages! If they dont't meet standards, clean them up, DON'T delete them. Badgerstripe 19:36, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep all. Deletion is not required in this matter. Cleanup is. Sr13 20:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.