Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twenty Major

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 23:38, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Twenty_Major

Self-promotion and vanity Timecop 12:09, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. PJM 12:40, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Who? What? --Depakote 12:52, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity, Cruft, Not Notable. We need a template for delete votes of blogs - they all seem to be the same. Adamn 12:54, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Nowhere near being notable. Skrewler 12:55, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Delete - I occasionally smoke in non-smoking areas, especially when it's cold outside. Are me and my blog notable? I am a blogger btw. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 14:20, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- Femmina 15:21, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete with objection to nominator's vendetta against all blogs without consideration of each article on its own merits. Turnstep 03:40, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
  • No vendetta aginst "all blogs". I fact-check and verify all links in articles that I put up for AFD. If this blog is too obscure and the article provides nothing more than a link to a blog, it should be deleted. See User:Timecop/The_war_on_blogs for more things that have been placed on AFD. --Timecop 06:37, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Worthless blog-cruft. -Incognito 14:13, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Preaky 06:47, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.