Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twelve project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 00:56, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Twelve project

Twelve project (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Found while clearing out CAT:CSD. I actually deleted this page, but I undeleted per request to my talk page. The request read: Hi, you recently speedily deleted the Twelve project entry due to the fact you considered it as not being notable. It was notable in that it features at least one member (more than one actually) from a notable group (Six By Seven). Surely this article should have been put up for discussion under the articles for deletion section. The reason that I am saying this is that Fuck me USA, which is linked back to this group and also has the same relationship with six by seven, is currently being discussed. In fact Twelve should be more elligible to have an article on Wikipedia seeing as two albums have been released. Both Twelve and Fuck Me USA are an essential part of the Six By Seven history/timeline. Therefore I nominated this to afd. Opinions on what to do with this? No Stance —— Eagle (ask me for help) 19:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. I feel this article should not be deleted. As I said on Eagle's talk page, this band is notable in that it features more than one person who is a member of another notable band. 2 official albums have been released. Twelve is an essential piece of the Six By Seven timeline (along with Fuck me USA) - also up for discussion).

The article will probably need some tidying up, but thats what Wikipedia is all about....other people can lend a hand! :-) --Olliemorr 20:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. It meets the WP:MUSIC criteria of having members that belong to an otherwise notable group. --Bobblehead 02:04, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Whispering 01:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Keep: WP:MUSIC criterion 6 says 'Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable; note that it is often most appropriate to use redirects in place of articles on side projects, early bands and such.' So there should certainly be something there, but it's not obvious to me that it needs to be a separate article. Is there any reason not to merge and redirect? Cheers, Sam Clark 09:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Meets WP:MUSIC for the two albums, I feel. Agree with Olliemorr: this article and the album articles need work. Bubba hotep 13:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.