Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tweak3d

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. JIP | Talk 17:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tweak3d

Website, Alexa rank 115,146; fails WP:WEB. Sandstein 12:21, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

It meets criteria for web content 1-5. -- Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.122.160.218. Sandstein 09:32, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Comment: No, it doesn't. There are only 3 criteria at WP:WEB, and it is not demonstrated that (1) "the content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works", (2) "the website or content has won a well known and independent award" or (3) "the content is distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators". The article itself must provide proofs that its subject meets one of these criteria; which it doesn't. -- Sandstein 09:32, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Proof - http://www.timesnews.net/columnArticle.dna?_StoryID=3594579:supamant3d 3:21, 20 February 2006

• OK, looks better already, but this isn't yet a mention in "multiple non-trivial published works". Sandstein 10:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Just google search tweak3d, you'll find enough information. supamant3d 11:07, 20 February 2006
• Delete per nom. Ardenn 04:08, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: maybe rewrite --MaNeMeBasat 14:37, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable forum cruft. — Feb. 26, '06 [15:44] <freakofnur_xture|talk>

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.