Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 1 July 2005 09:17 (UTC)

[edit] Twat

Dicdef. Not as encyclopedic as shit, fuck, cunt etc. @Dunc|☺ 23:33, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • No vote yet... but I'm inclined to think it's notable enough to deserve an entry all its own (even if, concededly, not notable enough to be one of George Carlin's Seven dirty words). I note that it made the expanded 10-word version. :-) -- BD2412 talk 00:19, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
  • Keep is now my vote. -Splash 15:28, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
  • Hmmm, a dicdef for sure, but so widely used I wonder....WP:NOT a dictionary, but...hmm...I wonder if this does expand along similarly tongue-in-cheek lines as the others mentioned. No vote just yet. -Splash 01:54, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • I've decided to vote KEEP - I added a note on the George Carlin bit, as well as another awful pun and that ancient usage referring to the TWA passenger who wants the alternative to coffee. -- BD2412 talk 04:51, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
  • Keep Current version is keepworthy, thus article now permanently keepworthy.
  • Keep. notable vulgarity, and my senile grandfather's favorite word, leading to much fun when we visit him. Xoloz 05:51, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, like the other vulgar words mentioned in the nomination. Kappa 06:38, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, this node is referenced from many other nodes including "Four-letter_word" Shodan
  • Keep, just worthy of inclusion I think jamesgibbon 15:52, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge the lot of them into swearwords. Radiant_>|< 15:52, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Sweetfreek 22:28, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect, as per Radiant. JamesBurns 09:29, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep What nonsense - this is clearly encylopedic. --131.111.8.96 11:17, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep -- Francs2000 | Talk 14:25, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep This word has been around for so bloody long, why should we neglect its entry and existence into Wikipedia? -- dennispaul26 11:13, 25 June 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.