Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tustena2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:25, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tustena

I am having difficulty locating the nominator of this article. In the mean time, consider this an abstain. Johnleemk | Talk 09:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Oh, wait. It's Sleepyhead81, whose nomination did not go through because of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tustena. Johnleemk | Talk 09:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

I nominated it. Looking closer it was actually deleted before and someone recreated the article. So it should be a speedy delete rather than going through the vfd process again. --Sleepyhead 11:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Since the page contents are not exact duplicates (far from it, actually), speedying cannot be done in this case. Johnleemk | Talk 12:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Meanwhile, I speedied it, because everyone just left it pointing at the old afd. Grrng. —Cryptic (talk) 16:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete advert. Stifle 21:29, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nominated but Sleepyhead needs to tread carefully, see Sleepyhead81 (talk · contribs). JzG 12:40, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as advertcruf. Renata 18:43, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.