This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash 23:14, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
Non-verifiable. I think. I didn't have any luck googling for it, and no other citations have been forthcoming. Bunchofgrapes 20:40, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
Delete Looks like a hoax and nn anyway Dlyons493 23:27, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
Delete - I watched your questioning of the users who created this page and their defence basically boiled down to "it's not nonsense because it's original research about a neologism". Yeesss... -- Francs2000 | Talk 02:20, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Probable hoax, non-notable at best. Quale 05:14, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.