Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tupton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 01:52, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tupton

Whilst this might be notable to those that live there if no-one else, this is a nothing of an article that almost qualifies for db:empty. However, it's a new user's creation and we should give him/her a fair crack of the whip.➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 22:11, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Very well cleaned up and expanded, beyond what I had thought possible. Therefore, I propose to withdraw this AfD nomination. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 16:02, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

• Keep I've tidied it up a bit, so it is at least a stub, and its a genuine geographical location Jcuk 23:07, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I've added a little more to the start that Jcuk has made. Grutness...wha? 23:28, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. I seem to recall running across the name of this place in a few novels. It cetainly is known for the pottery. Logophile 08:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand, per above. --Terence Ong 10:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.