Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tupac Shakur feuds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 06:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tupac Shakur feuds

Tupac Shakur feuds (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Un-encyclopedic, non-notable, trivial content. Full of alledged and unsourced comments littered with weasel wording. Delete as per the G-Unit feuds article. Lugnuts 19:50, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - unsourced and appears to be original research to some extent. Add any relevant material not already there to the Tupac Shakur article. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 19:55, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Based on precedent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G-Unit feuds and feuds/gossip dont belong on wikipedia Corpx 21:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Per nom and G-Unit feuds AfD. --- Realest4Life 23:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete don't know why I created that subpage in the first place Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 23:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

• N Delete- Although I didnt want the G-Unit Feuds article to be deleted, this should be deleted for the same reasons. --The-G-Unit-Boss 17:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Even if this was well sourced, it's best to merge relevant info in the Tupac Shakur page. Spellcast 18:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.