Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tumalip

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --Canley (talk) 11:43, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tumalip

Tumalip (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is a Baranggay that doesn't pass notability. Baranggays are parts of a town not a town itself so WP:LOCAL is not applicable Lenticel (talk) 12:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Strong Delete. As per nom. Starczamora (talk) 14:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete -- doesn't even pass WP:N. 212 people? --Howard the Duck 17:15, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Almost all barangays in the Philippines are not notable enough in themselves to merit individual articles in Wikipedia and there is a problem of getting enough reliable sources to create a full-fledged article. A simple Google search does not turn up any non-trivial sources that refer to this barangay. --seav (talk) 17:20, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. I don't know about barangays, but it's been established that all stand-alone places are notable. But if barangays are just small sub-communities within settlements, then I'd agree that they're probably not notable as stand-alone entries, and they all have to pass WP:V as well.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 07:33, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable enough. Or, since a barangay is too small a sub-unit of a town to have its own article, it might be better to have it merged with the main Licuan-Baay article (see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cabaroan, Bacnotan, La_Union. --- Tito Pao (talk) 03:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.