Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tubcat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 23:04, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tubcat

This article could never be expanded upon beyond the tiny stub that it is. Completely un-noteworthy Matt 08:10, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep, seems to be a popular Internet meme --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 08:34, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Just see the bluelinks in Internet meme. Feezo (Talk) 09:11, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Feezo. Article needs no improvement and documents existing mini-phenomenon. Notable in the way that contagious memes are. Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 12:00, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep notable internet memes. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 14:59, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as not encyclopedic. Brian G. Crawford 15:31, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete - I'm not sure there is more than you can say than it is a site about a very large cat. --waffle iron 17:06, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, just a stupid joke picture on a few websites. No real notability. Though the expression on the cat's face is pretty funny. Andrew Levine 20:24, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Oversize felines category. --Masssiveego 08:30, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep as a popular internet meme, per above.Roodog2k 15:25, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Within the realm of meme, notable. -- Zanimum 17:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Popular internet meme. Poor cat. Nigelthefish 18:19, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Well known meme. Is that frikkin' cat smiling or am I imagining it? Jtmichcock 03:32, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.