Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TrustDigital
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 02:14, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] TrustDigital
Seems to just be an ad, with much of its content copied verbatim from TrustDigital.com TomTheHand 17:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Advertising. There is little information in the article that isn't already present on the company's website. -- (aeropagitica) 17:30, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. PJM 17:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
This is not meant to be an ad...I have had a good experience using their product, and given the lack of information on mobile data security in the Wiki, I thought it would be a good idea to add some. I have taken down the external link to their site and only included relevant links to government sites concerning legislation.
- Comment Keep the link to their web site. (I just had to find it). The key to making this page better is to have a neutral point of view, and to have external evidance of notability per Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations). I think it might be OK for notability, but we need the sources beyond the company's own web site. I think the ownership and board of governance structure is interesting - I have to believe that somebody is writing about these guys. Find sources. Any of us can help make it more neutral.Obina 21:48, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete advert, but if someone wants to recreate an NPOV version they certainly can. Stifle 17:12, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.