Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truelove2005

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 06:56, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Truelove2005

• Strong Delete. This article is just promotional material, and if you see the talk page, you'll see that they actually try to copyright the article (a good, old-fashioned one too, not the gdfl). At any rate, I for one support articles about very, very minor films, bands and actors in the Wikipedia as long as they're real articles, not just promo. And for heaven's sakes, the movie hasn't even been made yet! Make the movie, write a real article, don't copyright it and I'll change my vote gladly. --Zantastik 03:29, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Hn 04:08, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete if possible. There have been a rash of these unmade student film articles swamping this site, so much so that I'm just about convinced that we're being hijacked. This has got to stop. - Lucky 6.9 04:17, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Promotional, the movie hasn't even been made yet! - Jersyko 14:09, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. Xezbeth 14:17, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, copyright violation. If the poster is not the copyright holder, then they have violated the holder's copyright. If they are the copyright holder, they have not released the information to the GFDL. RickK 18:57, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, promo, possible copyright violation. Megan1967 07:37, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.