Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tropical flowers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Nobody who says "rewrite" ever does it themselves; if User:Flyboy Will (or anyone else) wants to buck the trend and do some good work on this article, it won't harm him to have a blank canvas to work on. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 13:17, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Tropical flowers

The first half of the article is fluff, with little real info. The last half of this article is a direct cut n paste from the link at the bottom. Lots o' words, nothing substantial. Madman 05:57, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep and Rewrite. Copyvio should be removed etc, but the topic is certainly notable enough. Flyboy Will 06:27, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• In fact, the whole article was a copyvio from the web page that was handily given in the article. There was no prior non-infringing version to roll back to. Uncle G 08:58, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• While I think someone could write an article on this topic, delete this as copyvio. Capitalistroadster 09:47, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per CRM, this might make a good Cat tho. KillerChihuahua^?!? 11:43, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.