Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trollslayer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dwarf (Warhammer) following the merge. --Sam Blanning(talk) 17:53, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Trollslayer

Does not look to be important for an encyclopedia and has not had a clean-up or improvement of the text since it was created in January 2006. If deletion does not meet the consensus, than I suggest the article be shortened in able to simplify what is called a "Trollslayer" (i.e. the book named after the word or whatever). ~ clearthought 14:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Merge into related WH article. This is worth a 2 line mention, not its own article. --Svartalf 16:58, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as nonnotable Warhammer detail. The related WH article is Dwarf (Warhammer) and that already contains a description under the Slayers section. MLA 09:07, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 00:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per MLA. ViridaeTalk 00:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect. Someone will find that usefull, and if there's a book named Trollslayer, someone's going to look for it eventually. humblefool® 01:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect. Per above. Aranherunar 03:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per MLA. J Milburn 13:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect per above recommendations--Edtalk c E 13:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, I DAB'd the page... info already merged to Dwarf (Warhammer).--Isotope23 14:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, I don't think the disambig page is useful. The meaning of "trollslayer" can be covered separately in each of the main articles. JIP | Talk 15:27, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge & Redirect per JIP's reasoning. --WillMak050389 15:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.