Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trixbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Keitei (talk) 09:59, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Trixbox

• Non-notable and this should be covered briefly in Asterisk_PBX BJ 19:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Add infobox os and make it a stub and need for cleanup. --drange
• Keep - There is tons of info on the article, and I think it's relevant.DamianFinol 02:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Yet Another Linux Distro, more specialized than most, but no reason to delete --Alvestrand 08:13, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - This is really a full product not just a distro. There is a lot of code in trixbox that is not found anywhere else.
• Keep - Asterisk_PBX is only one part of Trixbox, just because the point of Trixbox is a act as an IP PBX is no reason for it to be grouped with the component that provides its PBX functionality. Cars have engines, we don’t remove reference to specific cars and place them under the engine entry -- Matthew 19:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.